It seems that’s what people said when you wrote ‘No-Go Zones’. They simply said “Nothing to see here” and “If we don’t write about it, then it’s not news”. “Doesn’t matter what evidence is presented, it’s just a secondhand account” (or a screenshot).
Did you dismiss the report made by the Wisconsin fella? Or the True The Vote people?
It seems that’s what people said when you wrote ‘No-Go Zones’. They simply said “Nothing to see here” and “If we don’t write about it, then it’s not news”. “Doesn’t matter what evidence is presented, it’s just a secondhand account” (or a screenshot).
Did you dismiss the report made by the Wisconsin fella? Or the True The Vote people?
Could you do some research and then provide that research as proof Emerald’s article is bunk?
Because if not, you’re no better than your retractors.
It seems that’s what people said when you wrote ‘No-Go Zones’. They simply said “Nothing to see here” and “If we don’t write about it, then it’s not news”. “Doesn’t matter what evidence is presented, it’s just a secondhand account” (or a screenshot).
Did you dismiss the report made by the Wisconsin fella? Or the True The Vote people?
Could you do some research and then provide that research as proof Emerald’s article is bunk?
Because if not, you’re no better than your retractors.